Page 26 - OHS, April/May 2025

P P E : H E A R I N G P R O T E C T I O N
Hearing Protection: Ensuring the Right Fit
Keeping pace with NIOSH’s fi t recommendations and hearing protection innovations.
BY DAVID KOPF
the most pervasive—and preventable—hazards. Hearing loss is
In the world of workplace health and safety, noise remains one of
the third most common chronic physical condition among U.S.
adults, and an estimated 22 million workers are exposed to haz-
ardous noise levels on the job each year, according to the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Although
many employers provide hearing protection devices (HPDs), the
eff ectiveness of those devices depends heavily on how well they fi t.
Recognizing this critical gap, NIOSH issued a new Science
Policy Update in January, recommending individual fi t testing of
HPDs as part of standard hearing conservation programs. Th is
guidance, along with recent innovations in hearing protection
technology, refl ects a growing shift toward personalized, data-
driven approaches to workplace hearing safety.
Why Fit Testing Matters
Many HPDs are labeled with a Noise Reduction Rating (NRR), a
measure of the potential attenuation the device can provide under
ideal laboratory conditions. But in real-world settings, that level of
protection oft en isn’t achieved. Factors such as incorrect insertion,
poor device selection, and variation in ear shape can all impact ef-
fectiveness. Fit testing addresses these variables by measuring the
actual attenuation achieved by each individual worker, off ering a
more precise understanding of their protection level.
NIOSH’s updated guidance recommends that employers use
quantitative fi t testing methods to assess how well a particular
HPD performs when worn by a specifi c individual. Th e agency
also advises retesting annually or whenever signifi cant changes oc-
cur in noise exposure, job tasks, or the type of hearing protection
used.
Th e benefi ts of fi t testing go beyond compliance. It serves as a
tool for worker education, reinforcing correct usage and highlight-
ing the importance of proper fi t. It also helps safety professionals
tailor HPD selection to specifi c needs, improving both comfort
and compliance.
The Regulatory Landscape
While OSHA’s current noise standard (29 CFR 1910.95) does not
require fi t testing for hearing protection, it does mandate that em-
ployers implement a hearing conservation program when workers
are exposed to noise levels at or above 85 dBA (time-weighted av-
erage over eight hours). NIOSH’s new recommendations represent
best practices, and while not legally binding, they are likely to in-
fl uence future policy and industry expectations.
In its 2017 letter of interpretation, OSHA acknowledged that
fi t testing can be used to verify training eff ectiveness and confi rm
proper initial fi tting of HPDs. With rising interest in data-driven
safety approaches, many organizations are choosing to integrate fi t
testing proactively—even in the absence of regulatory mandates.
OSHA’s letter on fi t testing, combined with NIOSH’s January rec-
ommendations, reinforce that choice.
Key Advances in Hearing Protection PPE
As the industry adopts more personalized and data-driven ap-
proaches to hearing conservation, hearing protection devices
themselves are evolving to support better fi t, comfort, and compli-
ance. Recent innovations can be grouped into three main areas:
1. Enhanced Comfort and Customization. Comfort plays a
signifi cant role in whether workers wear hearing protection con-
sistently and correctly. To address this, many newer devices are
designed with soft er materials, improved ergonomics, and cus-
tomizable features that adapt to individual ear shapes. Th ese en-
hancements aim to minimize discomfort during extended use and
promote higher rates of compliance. In Europe, updated standards
for hearing protectors now include considerations for comfort, us-
ability, and the performance of newer materials and technologies
under realistic working conditions.
2. Fit-Testing Systems. To ensure hearing protectors perform
as expected, individual fi t-testing systems have become an increas-
ingly valuable tool in hearing conservation programs. Th ese sys-
tems use quantitative methods to measure the actual attenuation
a device provides for a specifi c worker. Th e resulting data helps
safety professionals verify whether a hearing protector is eff ective
for each individual and guides proper training and device selec-
tion. Fit testing also reinforces good wear practices by showing
workers in real time how their technique aff ects protection levels.
3. Smart Hearing Protection. Th e integration of smart technol-
ogy into hearing protection is also on the rise. Th ese systems may
include features such as real-time noise exposure monitoring, wire-
less communication capabilities, and automatic data logging. Some
devices can alert wearers to unsafe noise levels or track usage patterns
for reporting and compliance purposes. By combining hearing pro-
tection with data collection and communication tools, these solutions
support both individual safety and broader risk management eff orts.
Together, these innovations reinforce the importance of indi-
vidualized fi t testing while expanding its utility as part of a broader,
proactive approach to hearing conservation.
Looking Ahead
Th e future of workplace hearing protection is moving toward
greater personalization, smarter technologies, and more rigorous
program evaluation involving fi t testing. NIOSH’s updated policy
signals a meaningful step forward in that evolution, encouraging
employers to move beyond generic NRR labels and take a more
individualized, evidence-based approach to worker protection.
For safety professionals, implementing a fi t testing program may
seem like a daunting investment, but the payoff is clear. In addition to
reducing the risk of occupational hearing loss, fi t testing helps ensure
compliance with best practice standards and can signifi cantly reduce
long-term costs tied to compensation claims and retraining.
David Kopf is the Executive Editor and Publisher of Occupational
Health & Safety.
24 Occupational Health & Safety | APRIL/MAY 2025 www.ohsonline.com