Page 20 - Security Today, May/June 2021

Body-worn Technology Cities are smarter, safer when the police department can capture images
By Kevin Taylor and Steve Jussaume
For better or for worse, the events of the past sev- eral years have put law enforcement under a micro- scope. Calls for improved safety and accountability within the law enforcement community have been widespread, and technologies like body-worn cam- eras have been endorsed—and in some cases even mandated—by many state and local governments.
This shift comes hand-in-hand with the continuing movement within many cities to embrace smart city technologies designed to improve safety and security, but police departments across the country have sometimes struggled to integrate this new technol- ogy into their lives and operating budgets. Manufacturers and integrators should be aware of both the operational and budget- ary constraints within the law enforcement community, and be prepared to offer solutions.
TODAY’S CITIES FACE FINANCIAL, SOCIAL,
AND OTHER CHALLENGES
In many cities, battles over social and political issues have spilled out into the streets. These demonstrations have stressed city infra- structure and placed increased attention and pressure on law en- forcement. Smart city resources such as IP surveillance cameras, body-worn devices, facial recognition technology and others have been used to maintain order, identify wrongdoers, investigate police misconduct, and even vindicate officers falsely accused of improper behavior.
In many ways, these new technologies play an important role in helping a community take meaningful steps toward becoming a “safe city”—a necessary and integral component of the larger journey toward becoming a “smart city.”
Body-worn devices have become an important piece of safe city architecture, and as cities look for new ways to improve life
for residents, businesses, and guests, understanding how best to support the law enforcement community has become increasingly critical. Like most of today’s smart sensors, body-worn devices can have a positive impact on both police departments and the communities they protect—but it is important to understand the challenges associated with embracing any new technology, espe- cially in the current climate.
COST IS A PROBLEM—BUT A SOLVABLE ONE
In many areas of the country, body-worn cameras are not just a “nice to have” technology anymore—they are a mandate, with officers now required to wear them to provide additional trans- parency to the communities they protect. While there have been many arguments over the pros and cons of body-worn technol- ogy, fewer conversations have centered on funding it. There is more to a body-worn camera solution than simply purchasing the devices themselves. Issues like storage, maintenance and scal- ability can introduce additional costs into the equation.
It is critical for departments to be aware of the funding re- sources available to them. For example, a department providing resource officers for local school districts may be able to use edu- cation funding to equip those officers. There are also government programs available: the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) al- lows criminal justice organizations to apply for body-worn cam- era grants, and they are not alone.
Manufacturers and integrators should be prepared to make end-users aware of these options, as this type of funding assis- tance is an unfortunate necessity. While many states have publicly embraced body-worn cameras, the actual money committed to those programs often remains insufficient.
Another way to defray the cost of body-worn devices is through the embrace of open-architecture solutions, which can help users
20
MAY/JUNE 2021 | SECURITY TODAY
LAW ENFORCEMENT
John Gomez/Shutterstock.com