Page 39 - Security Today, April 2019

The Impact of Technology
Top six questions to help answer the impact of security on campus
BTy Jim Primovic
echnology is everywhere in today’s classrooms and campuses. As the suite of technology solutions for campus security expands, so does the complexity for how to apply them in a fit-for-purpose way. The IT managers of the world not only have the job of creat-
ing enriching learning environments, they also have a responsibility to apply technology solutions that have the potential to save lives.
The convergence of IT and security makes it possible to approach campus security in a more comprehensive and holistic way, but that convergence raises new questions and concerns. Whether you are a campus IT manager, a security professional or administrator, there are six common questions you’ll face when it comes to improving campus security.
Q: How does convergence impact campus security?
A: The convergence of IT and security enables campuses to man- age both physical and logistical security with the same policies and procedures, ensuring a more consistent, streamlined approach. Con- vergence also presents an opportunity to leverage the IT infrastruc- ture to increase access control coverage at a much lower cost than traditional deployments.
With the recent proliferation of IP-enabled cameras, WiFi and Power over Ethernet (PoE), network infrastructure can be re-used to connect IP-enabled access control locks. The ability to expand the access control system more easily and affordably means a higher level of security across campus. In addition, the influence of IT standards on physical security can facilitate troubleshooting, ensure maximum performance and reliability, and minimize costs. Use of standards- based technology also eliminates the need for any additional training.
Q: Can my existing network handle new technology tools?
A: It’s the responsibility of IT professionals to protect the net-
WWW.SECURITYTODAY.COM 31
work, so it is only natural that they approach the addition of new types of devices with caution. One of the most common concerns is the security of the information being transmitted. Be sure to verify that any solutions considered are using AES-128 encryption and sup- port the latest WiFi standards. From there, campus network security policies can be easily extended to physical security and access control.
It is also common to be concerned with how much bandwidth IP-enabled locks use. WiFi and PoE locks have negligible impact on network resources. Over the course of a day, each lock transmits only 5kB to 10kB of data when communicating with the network, either at scheduled intervals (WiFi) or throughout the day (PoE).
Battery-operated WiFi locks are not always communicating on the network—they are only truly “on” a few seconds a day to com- municate updates and card privilege changes. WiFi locks are usually offline (asleep), waking up for an “alarm condition” or on a user de- fined schedule. Alarm conditions can also be user defined and in- clude, but are not limited to, card unknown, door prop, door forced, metal key used, low battery, etc. to allow campus security a level of personalization to fit the specific needs of the entry point. PoE locks operate in a similar way, but because of the PoE connection they are able to communicate additional information, such as real-time door position status and unlock commands.
Q: I am interested in increased access control but am concerned about the required maintenance of the associated systems. What do I need to be prepared for?
A: There are a variety of access-control solutions available, each with varying levels of required maintenance. It is important to find a solution that can balance security needs with budget and maintenance requirements. Luckily, there is a wide range of options on the market that can be customized to help meet each campus’ unique needs.
CAMPUS SECURITY
cdrin/Shutterstock.com