Page 16 - Campus Security & Life Safety, November 2017

About four years ago, the campus suffered a rash of car break-ins that unnerved faculty and students. In the wake of the crimes, school administrators decided to install a net- work of video surveillance cameras to aug- ment its security program.
According to Chris Golden, Lee Universi- ty’s director of IT Operations, the college ini- tially installed approximately 35 IP cameras, which included a mix of both indoor and out- door models, as part of what was phase one of a larger surveillance project intended to pro- vide greater video coverage throughout the campus. While the majority of the cameras were focused on parking areas to address the growing threat of car burglaries, some were also deployed inside one of the school’s stu- dent recreation centers to help deter theft, and monitor high-traffic entries and exits.
However, it wasn’t long after the network was up and running that security staff began having trouble with the video management system, which was an appliance-based solution.
“The software we had was complicated and clunky. When we wanted to review footage, operators had to change video settings,” explained Golden. “And anytime there was incident and they had to view recorded video, IT had to get involved and retrieve the video file. Things shouldn’t be that hard.”
The old VMS was such a hindrance, in fact, that it ended up costing the university more money than they had originally budgeted because every time a camera was added to the network, more storage was needed to accom- modate it.
To help alleviate the burden the VMS was placing on the video system, Lee University consulted with a group of trusted vendors and resellers. After evaluating a number of the top brands in the industry, the university opted to deploy Arteco’s Video Event Management System (VEMS).
According to Golden, Arteco’s VEMS solu- tion helped the university address some of its biggest challenges. Among these were making sure the university could meet its video stor- age retention requirements, not overtaxing the network as more cameras were added, providing security staff with a user-friendly experience, and reducing the time IT had to spend interacting with the system.
“We’re just a small IT shop, so the more I can pass a system on to my team and only step in when there are problems, the better it is for me. Then I can spend my time with other higher priority issues,” Golden said.
Given the scale of the university and the IT infrastructure management responsibilities, the process of migrating to a new video man-
agement system had to be seamless as well. “We handed the Arteco system off to our campus safety team and now when there is any kind of incident, they can pull the video themselves,” Golden added. “Also, when there is turnover in the security department, they can simple manage user access to the system
and make any necessary changes.”
Having used the Arteco VEMS platform for
nearly three years now, Golden said the differ- ence in video management quality they’ve experienced has been night and day. Not only has the security staff enjoyed a more user- friendly experience, but they rarely, if ever, have contact to university’s IT team. In fact, during a recent computer upgrade, several campus safety officers were able to download the software and set it up on their newly issued university laptops with very little assistance.
From an IT perspective, Golden said the Arteco software has not only been simple and straightforward to manage, but he’s also received top notch technical support—be it through online tutorials or a quick phone call.
Golden said that Lee University has seen both tangible and intangible benefits as a result of the Arteco deployment. Video has aided in the capture of people breaking into cars and
harassing others on the campus. In one par- ticular instance, the video was turned over to the Cleveland Police Department, which made several arrests as a result. Beyond that, Golden said students and faculty members now feel safer knowing that video surveillance is an additional tool for campus safety.
“It gives our students a sense of security. They can focus on their academics and having a good experience at college,” he said. “Every now and then one of the campus safety direc- tors will come up to me and say, ‘hey, the sys- tem paid off again, we were able to solve a crime and get the video over to the police department and they made an arrest,’ and that makes you feel good.”
The university is currently planning to embark on phase two of its video project, which will greatly enhance the number of cam- eras on campus, as soon as funding can be secured. Golden said the
Arteco VEMS will serve as the backbone of all future video deployments on the campus.
Steve Birkmeier is the vice president at Arteco.
CS16 WWW.CAMPUSLIFESECURITY.COM | NOVEMBER 2017
A SPECIAL SECTION TO SECURITY TODAY AND THE JOURNAL
CAMPUS SECURITY & LIFE SAFETY
Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock.com