Page 26 - OHS, January/February 2022

OIL & GAS
Selecting a Personal Sampling Pump for Offshore Oil and Gas
There are seven key features to look for when purchasing a sampling pump.
OBY TIM TURNEY
SHA issues citations and penalties if businesses violate permissible exposure limits (PEL). PELs are legal limits designed to control employee exposure to hazardous substances in an eight-hour period to prevent health risks.
However, employers are also advised to monitor recommendations from industrial hygiene experts and manufacturers because it is estimated that 90 percent of OSHA’s PELs have not been updated since the 1960s.1 Consequently, OSHA may issue citations under the general duty clause of the OSH Act if exposure limits exceed industry-wide standards and pose a threat to employee health.
Industrial hygiene methods are geared towards measuring personal exposure using personal air sampling pumps because the tried-and-tested method can quantify personal exposure and ensure compliance with regulatory limits. So, when purchasing a sampling pump, what features should you look for?
Safety Ratings. Many pumps are Intrinsically Safe (IS) rated as standard but it is worth checking that your pump’s IS rating is still appropriate for your facility to avoid any safety issues. An IS-rated pump will not cause an explosion in a flammable atmosphere, critical for workplaces with significant levels of combustible substances. In addition, consider whether the pumps will be used in a harsh environment. For example, many pumps now have “Ingress Protection” ratings, which means they are protected from ingress by water and dust.
Battery Life. When selecting a personal sampling pump, the battery life must be considered to maintain operation throughout the monitoring period. Due to the variable nature of the offshore oil and gas environment, the sampling pump can be put under changeable amounts of operating stress during a single monitoring period. If measuring dusts, as the filter media becomes loaded with sample, the pump must draw harder to overcome back pressure, and this in turn draws more power from the battery. As a result, lithium-Ion batteries are now starting to be used in the latest personal sampling pumps with significant advantages over traditional nickel-metal hydride and nickel-cadmium batteries. For example, li-Ion batteries have the highest energy density, which means that you need fewer cells and can ultimately achieve a smaller, lighter pump. Li-Ion batteries also do not suffer from the “memory effect,” meaning only part of the battery charge is usable. This will avoid having to change the batteries regularly or implement a battery management procedure.
Compliance. It is vital to check that your pump meets the latest international standard for air sampling pumps. Compliance with ISO 13137 ensures accurate sampling and meaning you will not have to repeat measurements.
Back-Pressure Capability. The most significant factor to consider in the operational capabilities of your personal sampling pump is the choice of sampling media. The greater the back-pressure exerted by more challenging filters or tubes, the harder the motor needs to work. Membrane filters, as opposed to standard glass fibre filters, exert more back-pressure. If you use these filters routinely, check the back-pressure capabilities
specified by your pump manufacturer. Will they cope? Pulsation and Air-Flow. The ISO 13137:2013 standard re- quires that the pulsation of a personal sampling pump shall not exceed 10 percent of the flow rate. A pulsation measurement shows the difference in air flow between cycles; through every cycle, as the pump draws air in and expels it simultaneously, this exchange process causes an uneven flow. A large pulsation value means that if you are using a cyclone head for collecting respirable samples, flow does not remain steady, and the size cut of the re- spirable fraction is affected. To combat this effect, manufacturers include pulsation dampeners, which are rubber diaphragms that act as extra reservoirs of air to smooth the flow. Ensure that the
pulsation values are within specification for your chosen pump. Most pumps control the flow of air through the pump using a “constant flow” control mechanism. As back-pressure increases, the pump detects the change and alters the flow accordingly. At the end of the sample, flow should still be within plus or minus five per cent of the calibrated flow set at the start of the measurement. A constant flow ensures that you can be confident in the volume of air sampled for your exposure calculations, so
ensure your pump can do this to avoid having to repeat samples. Constant Pressure Control. This is primarily used for low- flow applications and allows the possibility of taking samples with multiple sorbent tubes for gases and vapors. For many pumps, in order to do a low-flow measurement, you would purchase a separate constant-pressure controller. If you frequently undertake low-flow measurements, it is worth investing in a pump that has this built-in, especially if you need to sample through multiple
tubes at once, where it is a must have feature.
Connectivity and Bluetooth. The latest generation of
Bluetooth enabled pumps and flow calibrators can automate the calibration process and save valuable time, increasing confidence in the calibration results, which can be saved and/ or emailed for reporting. Pulsation, once tested in a laboratory, can now be checked in the field at the same time as a normal flow rate calibration through an airflow calibrator equipped with Bluetooth. As advances in technology continue to develop, remote methods can avoid disturbing workers and improve the validity and reliability of sample data.
It is vital that these factors are at front of mind when purchasing new equipment. Monitoring will help keep employees protected throughout the working day by ensuring air-sampling pumps identify hazardous amounts of fumes, dust and gases that increase the risk of long-term damage to worker health.
Tim Turney is a Global Marketing Manager at occupational hygiene and environmental expert Casella.
REFERENCE
1. https://cen.acs.org/safety/industrial-safety/Former-OSHA-head-David- Michaels/99/i24
22 Occupational Health & Safety | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2022
www.ohsonline.com